An Israeli Perspective

This piece was written with the express and sole purpose of changing minds, specifically the minds of those who support the Palestinian side of the current (2025) Israeli Palestinian conflict.  I am quite aware that most people belong to the camp of “don’t confuse me with facts, as my mind is already made up” (this is called “confirmation bias,” and it is very common among humans).  For those of you who belong to that camp, you can stop reading now as what lies ahead will only upset you.  For those of you who believe that you are open minded and are responsive to verifiable facts, history and logic, please read on.

Americans have no problem offering their opinions when they have no facts.  Antisemitism is a perfect case in point.  Antisemitism is so old there must be some truth to it.  There are so few Jews and they don't fight back.  Worst case scenario, you say something and he takes offense and you didn't even know he was Jewish.  Good people everywhere hurled the charge of "war crimes" at the state of Israel before she even declared statehood.

Herewith, my (biased but factual) responses to (recent) charges made against the state of Israel.

 

Genocide

This word was coined in 1944, after and because of the Nazi Holocaust.  It means the (deliberate) killing or extermination of a tribe or a race or a people.  Nazis killed 2/3 of all the Jews living in Europe.  6,000,000 souls in four years, or 4100+ / day.  The coining of the word "genocide" to describe this horrific event was not an accident.

If we accept the number of deaths claimed by the Palestinian authorities, as of November 5th, 2025, 68,875 Palestinians had been killed by Israelis in 760 days, 90 souls / day.  3% of Gaza's population and 2.2% as deadly as the Nazis' Final Solution per day.  If this is a genocide, Israeli Jews are not very good at it.

On October 7th, 2023, Hamas soldiers attacked and killed 1195 persons (an equivalent attack on the United States would have resulted in 43,605! casualties) and took 250 hostages from Israel’s Nova music festival.  The horrific carnage of the War in Gaza was a counter attack that was an act of war, not a genocide.  When allies targeted hundreds of thousands of civilians in World War II, it was never called a genocide as these actions were acts of (a defensive) war.

According to Wikipedia’s List of Genocides, since 1925 – 100 years ago – there have been 15 genocides with casualties greater than Gaza’s casualties; since 1950, eight; since 1980, four.  Why can so few of us name even one genocide that has no Jews involved?

Some define genocide as the intent to destroy a people.  Israel has formally acknowledged their goal to destroy Hamas (a political-military group that controls Gaza), but not Gazans or Muslims anywhere.  On the other hand, the written charters of Hamas and Hezbollah have officially called for the destruction of the Jewish state of Israel and her Jewish inhabitants.  If genocide is an intention, perhaps it is Hamas that is guilty of genocide.

Apartheid

This word was first used in South Africa by the Dutch overlords (Afrikaners), and it literally means separateness or apartness.  In the case of South Africa, it meant the oppression or subjugation of a powerless majority (Black) population by a powerful minority (white) population.  As it is used to describe the relationship between Israelis and Palestinians, it would mean the oppression or subjugation of a weak Palestinian population by a powerful Israeli population.  Implied in the word is the relationship of two people living in the same country, so it would have to describe the relationship of these two peoples living in Israel (or the West Bank).  Putting color and population imbalance aside, Muslims (21% of Israel’s population) living in Israel have the same rights as Israeli Jews.  They vote, they sit in the Knesset and on Israel’s Supreme Court.  This was surely not the case in apartheid South Africa.  Israeli Muslims do experience more hardship than the average Israeli Jew, but the same can be said about inequality among Israeli Jews; Israel is an unequal society, like the United States (but less so), indeed like all nations.  Israeli Muslims have more rights than Muslim citizens in every majority Muslim nation state in the region.  If the apartheid charge refers to the West Bank, a majority Muslim territory, Jews and Muslims live there, surely not peaceably (and Israeli Jews have a lot to answer for) but equally surely not apartheid.

 

Ethnic Cleansing

This term was first used in English in 1991.  Since then, the term has been used (sometimes retroactively) to describe the removal of Muslim Arabs from their homes (in Israel, in Gaza, and the West Bank) several times, but always as the result of wars that they lost.

In today’s Israel, 21% of its population is Muslim Arabs.  They are the descendants of those Arabs who did not leave (1 in 6) in 1948.  On the other hand, in 1948, there were some 885,000 Jews living in communities throughout the Arab world. Today, the Jewish community is extinct in Libya, Iraq, Sudan and Afghanistan.  Jews number less than 100 in Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Bahrain, and Bangladesh.  Turkey and Iran are the only Muslim nations that are home to more than 1% of their Jewish population in 1948.  Perhaps the charge of ethnic cleansing can be more accurately leveled at Muslim countries in the region that have cleansed their own population of their Jews.

Colonizer

Europeans colonized the Americas, Great Britain colonized India and Australia.  In what ways has Israel colonized Palestine?  With the brief exception of the Babylonian Exile, Jews have lived in Israel or Palestine continuously for 3800 years, while no Muslim lived there until 1300 years ago.  While the number of Jews has always (until 1948) been fewer than the number of Muslims, there is no record of any Jew or any Jewish state taking property by force from a Palestinian until Arab forces declared war on the newborn state of Israel in 1948.  In addition, all Israelis left Gaza in 2005, hardly a colonizing power.  Ask a Palestinian who is the colonizing power in Gaza; if he feels safe, he will say Hamas.

Refugees

Refugees are people who are (still) displaced from their homes (often by war).

The Palestinian Refugee Crisis is the only refugee problem in history where children and grandchildren of the original refugees are still considered refugees (see UNRWA).  In 1948, 750,000 Arabs fled Israel (mostly at the urging of the Muslim armies) but 150,000 remained in Israel.  Palestinian “refugees” now number 5,900,000.  The 1/6 who stayed, and their children and grandchildren, live better lives (socially, economically, politically) in Israel not only than their refugee counterparts but than a typical Muslim living in majority Muslim countries.  A significant part of the Palestinian refugees’ problem is the refusal on the part of the nation states where they reside to grant them citizenship.

 

Right of Return

a) Palestinian version: a non-negotiable demand of Palestinian leadership that Palestinian refugees have a legal right to the land and property that they abandoned in 1948.

b) Israeli version: the right of any Jew to settle and become a citizen of Israel.

“What is yours is mine” vs. “welcome.”

  

Zionists: people who believe that Jews have a Right to a homeland

Putting aside the fact that Jews have lived in what we now call the state of Israel for three thousand years, that they are therefore the indigenous people of that land, what if the only justification for their Right to a homeland was that they won every aggressive war of extermination against them from 1948 on?   Is that not Right enough?  Where else in the world is that not Right enough?

An anti-Zionist may further believe that no Jews should live in a Palestinian state.  Or that killing Jews anywhere is a worthy goal.

 

Killing babies: a special and horrific case of war’s collateral damage

While the charge is true, IDF soldiers have killed Palestinian women and children, what is equally true is that Palestinians have quite deliberately targeted civilians, including women and children and babies, since before 1948.  The IDF has never deliberately targeted civilians, women or children.

 

October 7th

All of the above charges exploded after Hamas attacked Israel on October 7th, 2023.  Indeed, anti-Israel protests in America erupted on the same day, weeks before Israel counter attacked in Gaza. 

Antisemitism, or Jew hatred, did not originate days before or after October 7th, or even in 1948; it has been a constant theme of (Western) history for at least 2000 years.  Mostly because Jews have been few in number and rarely armed, mostly because Jews have refused to convert or bend the knee to their conquerors, mostly because Jews have been perceived as too successful but always by devious means, and mostly because those who live “lives of quiet desperation” need someone to blame for their own misery and blaming Jews has become a habit with a long history.

 

A Two State Solution

Since the U.N.’s partition plan in 1947, the two sides of the conflict have met multiple times to discuss peace.  For the most part, the Israelis have been willing to compromise while the Palestinian side has not.  It is certainly the case that Hamas wants a one state solution, a Palestinian state with a Muslim population.

Goals

Israelis: peace.

Palestinians: Free Palestine, from the river to the sea (no Israeli state, no Jews). 

Yes, it is not that simple, (Israeli) Jews have been in the wrong all too often.  Especially in reaction to Palestinian “provocations.”  They are far from perfect; they are, after all, far too human.  But what is equally true is that Jews and Israelis have always been held to a different standard from other peoples.  And by “always” I mean always, not just since 1948 or October 7th, 2023.  Indeed, the UNHRC (United Nations Human Rights Council), since its inception in 2006, has condemned Israel 62 times and the rest of the world 55 times.  It’s not fair but it is reality.  And its name is antisemitism.

Coda

You had Jewish friends, you said something offensive about Jews or Israel without meaning to, you didn’t know you should apologize, they dropped you as a friend.  Words have consequences.

P.S., any debate and any trial anywhere in the world has speakers who are expected to present one side of an argument.  In an argument between Israelis and Palestinians, neither side is expected to be impartial.  The job of each speaker is to present their side’s perspective as forcefully, and as honestly, as they can.  That is why my piece is called, An Israeli Perspective.  If you, dear reader, have an issue with any of my statements, many of which are generalizations, it will be incumbent upon you not to show one or more exceptions to my generalizations but to show that my generalizations are false.  The carnage of the War in Gaza is ghastly, but Hamas is responsible for the fact that there is a War in Gaza.

Addendum: Saturday, 10/05/2024

I sent a link to this essay to a (former) friend of mine, a man in his 60’s, asking for feedback.  He replied: I really don't know enough to comment. Got to do some reading!

He did not mention what he needed to read or how long he would need before feeling competent to comment, so I figured I would help him out.  I have a young friend who is a bit of an expert using ChatGPT, at least compared with me.  So, I asked him to get feedback from ChatGPT.  He fed ChatGPT this question: Can you proofread this essay to check for factual or logical errors?

Here is ChatGPT’s reply, with a) boldfacing to alert the reader that ChatGPT has given its stamp of approval to some statement that I have claimed to be factual.  When I write “you” I am speaking directly to ChatGPT

So, ChatGPT, take it away!

 

Your essay presents a strong viewpoint, but there are some factual inaccuracies and areas where clarification could help avoid logical errors {I did not find any "factual inaccuracies" or “logical errors” in your analysis; please point them out} or oversimplifications. Here are some points to consider:

• Israel’s Demographics: The figures you’ve presented for Israel’s religious demographics—74% Jewish, 18% Muslim, 2% Christian—are roughly accurate, but the “other 6%” may need further clarification as they generally include smaller religious groups and those who identify as “other” in censuses. Additionally, stating that 68% of Israeli Jews were born in Israel is correct but the breakdown of descendants from European and Arab Muslim countries could be more nuanced. Some Jews from Arab countries (Mizrahi Jews) also have complex histories of migration and identity that could be explored more accurately.
• But all I am trying to do is show that Jewish Israel is not 100% Jewish, unlike the Muslim Arab countries in the region.  And that Israel is not a White European colonizing power.  I am sure that a discussion of Mizrahi Jews would be interesting but has nothing to do with my thesis, one way or another.
• Rights of Israeli Arabs: While Israeli Arabs do have citizenship rights, the claim that they “have more rights than the common man and woman in any majority Muslim population” is a broad generalization. In practice, Israeli Arabs face systemic challenges, such as unequal allocation of resources in education and infrastructure and disparities in housing. Though they have voting rights and representation in the Knesset, there are ongoing debates about whether they experience full equality in comparison to Jewish citizens.  
• An accurate generalization.  There are no "debates" in Gaza – unlike endless debates in Israel – too dangerous.  Inequality, official and otherwise, is a human phenomenon; Israel has its issues, as do Americans, and every nation on the face of the Earth.  What ChatGPT said about Israeli Arabs can equally be said about Mizrahi Jews, the largest portion of Jews in Israel.  And where else in the Arab Muslim world do Muslims have as many rights as they do in Israel?
• Genocide Definition: Your definition of genocide is correct, but the comparison of population growth rates between Palestinians and Jews doesn’t directly refute claims of genocide. Genocide involves intent to destroy a people, in whole or in part, and is not solely measured by population numbers.  The “2% of Gaza’s population killed” argument simplifies the complexities of conflict and casualty counts.  Additionally, framing the argument as “Maybe you don’t care unless Jews are the killers” is an emotionally charged statement that might undermine your credibility in presenting a balanced argument.
• Genocide is intent?  Intent with no action is just a thought; genocide is ALL action!  If intent defines genocide, look at every Palestinian charter for clear statements of their intent to destroy the Jewish state and all its inhabitants; the Israeli PM’s intent is to destroy Hamas, the political-military force in Gaza, not the Palestinian people; not genocide, but war.  And genocides never stop at 2%.  ChatGPT seems to prefer complexity and confusion to clarity.  A balanced argument?  Like the woman who was raped was equally responsible for the act of rape?
• Ethnic Cleansing: The term ethnic cleansing, like genocide, has a specific meaning: the forced removal of a population. Your statistics about Jewish populations in Arab countries after 1948 are largely accurate, but many scholars suggest that the exodus of Jews from Arab lands was influenced by a mix of factors including persecution, state-sponsored campaigns, and the broader Arab-Israeli conflict. It's debatable whether all these cases qualify as ethnic cleansing, as some involved complex voluntary migration patterns, while others were indeed forced.
• Gimme a break, Jews fled the land they had lived in for centuries voluntarily?  Yeah, to avoid slaughter.
• Palestinian Refugees: The statement that Palestinians are the only refugee group where descendants are still considered refugees (under UNRWA) is largely correct. However, it's important to acknowledge that this classification is a result of international decisions and policies , and not necessarily a manipulation of refugee status. The assertion that Palestinians in Israel “live better lives” than refugees or people in other Muslim countries is also a broad {and accurate} claim that doesn’t take into account the diversity of experiences and challenges faced by different populations.
• In all of world history, permanent refugee status spanning generations is utterly unique to these Palestinian people.  They would have done better had they moved on with their lives.  Who cares whose idea it was?  “The diversity of experiences and challenges faced by different populations”?  Oh, stop!  This is a blog post, not a book!  Not to mention, that the level of detail that ChatGPT claims to prefer would only detract from my readers’ understanding what I am trying to say, valid or otherwise.
• Right of Return: The contrast between the Palestinian and Israeli versions of the right of return is valid, but describing the Palestinian version as “What is yours is mine” is pejorative. This kind of language detracts from an objective analysis.  The Palestinian right of return is based on their claim to property and land lost during the 1948 war, while the Israeli version is grounded in the Law of Return for Jews. A more neutral comparison would strengthen your argument.
• The Palestinian “right of return” (the “right” to ownership of homes and property that people abandoned, most often at the urging of their own leaders who were quite sure that their war of extermination would succeed; keep in mind that many Palestinian Arabs remained and now live better [inarguable!] lives than Palestinians living in Gaza or the West Bank) is pejorative, it IS theft.  The Israeli Right of Return is a more generous version of our own naturalization laws.  A “neutral comparison” between these “Rights of Return” would be a bald-faced lie.  What ChatGPT really means by an “objective analysis” is that neither side is more right or wrong than the other.
• Zionists and Anti-Zionists: The idea that there are more Christian Zionists than Jewish Zionists is a point worth elaborating on, as Christian Zionism has significant political and religious roots, particularly in the U.S. Regarding anti-Zionism, it’s important to distinguish between opposition to Israeli policies or the existence of a Jewish state and outright support for violence against Jews.  Conflating all anti-Zionists with people who support “killing Jews anywhere” oversimplifies a complex issue.
• My only point is: Jews are not the only Zionists (people who believe that Jews are entitled to their own land, their own nation-state).  No sane person equates opposition to Israeli policies (PM Bibi Netanyahu policies) with anti-Zionism.  Period!  Opposition to the existence of the Jewish state is 100% clear support of violence against Jews, as the only way that Jews will give up Israel is by losing a war of annihilation; if you don’t know that, you are a fool.  OK, fine, maybe only killing Jews in Israel or in Muslim countries or Muslim neighborhoods worldwide.  Complex?  What is complex about it?
• Killing Babies: The topic of civilian casualties in conflict is always sensitive. While your claim that the IDF does not deliberately target civilians may be supported by official policy, there have been accusations and investigations by international organizations that challenge this. On the other hand, groups like Hamas have been documented targeting civilians, which is a critical distinction.
• So, killing civilians, especially women and children, should always be condemned, especially when it is NOT the policy of one’s own leadership.  Those “international organizations” have shown their antisemitic, anti-Zionist stripes for decades, ever since Israel declared its own statehood in 1948.
• October 7th: The statement that antisemitism has existed for 2,000 years is accurate, and your explanation of some of the historical causes is generally correct, though oversimplified. The sentence “Maybe because Jews have been perceived as too successful but always by devious means” could be rephrased to avoid reinforcing harmful stereotypes, even while discussing them.
• ChatGPT just hates simplicity and generalizations; but a ChatGPT version of my short essay would be ten times as long.  ChatGPT seems to suggest that my talking about antisemitism is responsible for it.  Wow!
• Coda: The final section is a personal commentary that seems out of place in an otherwise politically charged essay.  If you intend to use it as a rhetorical device, it would benefit from further elaboration or explanation to connect it to the broader themes of the essay.
• What???

Summary of Suggested Improvements:

• Avoid generalizations about Israeli Arabs and the rights of people in Muslim-majority countries.
• Why?  Good generalizations are not useful?
• Clarify the difference between population growth and genocide, and avoid inflammatory language.
• See above.
• Use more precise language regarding ethnic cleansing and the Jewish exodus from Arab lands.
• If a minority population is threatened by a nation's government, and they escape before being captured, do they have to wait around and be murdered for it to be called cleansing?  And, yeah, I know it is Israel that has been charged with ethnic cleansing, but that is just a tactic to deflect scrutiny of their own actions.
• Reframe the Palestinian right of return discussion in a less pejorative manner.

o    Only if theft can be made non-pejorative.  The Palestinian Right of Return is a non-negotiable demand of the Palestinian leadership, intended to make negotiating for a two-state solution, or for a lasting peace, impossible.

• Be cautious when discussing anti-Zionism and avoid broad stereotypes or assumptions.

o   Why?  Anti-Zionism calls for the end of any Jewish state; it looks pretty antisemitic to me.

• Consider more nuance in discussions of military tactics and civilian casualties.

o   How about all the civilian casualties suffered by Israelis for 75 years while not at war?

• This would help provide a more balanced, factually grounded argument.

o    My argument IS factually grounded, ChatGPT said so seven times.  Lack of balance is not the author’s fault; it is the reality of the situation.  Many of the claims of the Palestinian side are a clear instance of George Orwell’s doublethink.

o      Antisemitism did not appear for the first time last October, nor in 1948, nor in the 1890’s, nor 500 years ago, and it even has a checkered past in the good ole USA.  It is sad, but predictable, that it has reared its head recently among otherwise bright college freshmen with no history of caring about history.

o      with a nod to Kurt Vonnegut, “and so it goes.”}

o I can only hope that my words make a difference.  But I'm not holding my breath; most antisemites deny their own Jew hatred, even to themselves, it is such a nasty word!

 

 

Addendum: Sunday, 10/13/2024

Happy 35th Birthday, AOC!  Old enough to run for president.  Wise enough to mature and learn what you have to learn?

I wonder if the definition of a Zionist - someone who believes that Jews have a right to their own homeland - makes it clear that an anti-Zionist is one who believes otherwise.  I see no wiggle-room for any anti-Zionist to claim that he is not an antisemite.  Yes, I know: there are Jewish anti-Zionists; and yes, there are antisemitic Jews.  We are a rowdy bunch: ask 100 Jews for an opinion on a single question and you will get 102 opinions!  And some of these Jews live in Israel!  Ask a bunch of Palestinians for an opinion on a single question and you will get how many opinions.  Yup, you guessed it, ONE.

Addendum: Monday, 11/18/2024

I avoided a discussion of ChatGPT's "logical inaccuracies" because, a) it made the same points as the factual inaccuracies essay, and b) it was three times the length of my original blog post.  The most remarkable takeaway from its discussion is how utterly boring/soporific its "suggested revisions" are.  And how it really hates generalizations, the hallmark of all social sciences (a "generalization").  And it preferred that I write an objective analysis rather than a partisan argument.  There is a time and place for objective analysis, when the author is convinced that neither side is right or wrong, that neither side is more good or evil, and that the reader does not have the wisdom to discern the truth when both sides get to tell their story.  It would not do well for ChatGPT to argue a case in a courtroom, as its client would surely lose.  Try writing an objective analysis of World War II.  "For more than 2000 years, Jews have been scapegoats, so they must have deserved it."  "Your kid is always the victim of the high school bully, so he must have deserved it."  "You were raped, you must have provoked the rapist."  I trust the reader to listen to both sides, and to judge which side has more merit.

Jews are 1/5th of 1% of the world's population, two human beings out of every thousand.  But the world, the Western world, Christians and Muslims who represent more than half of the world's population, can't seem to get through a day without expressing an opinion, an ugly opinion, about Jews, not individual Jews (well, maybe), but as a people.  Sad, very sad.

Addendum: Thursday, 12/12/2024

Bashar al-Assad has been ... deposed and now resides - where else - in Russia, as a guest of Vlad Putin.  The civil war that erupted in 2011 to remove him from power has cost the lives of ... 620,000(!) Syrians.  That is 48,000 dead per year, more than Gaza claims have been killed by the IDF in 14 months, but for 13 years!  No one talks about Syrian deaths, they don't have the P.R. apparatus of the Palestinians.  And, so it goes.

Addendum: Thursday, 02/20/2025

My problem is not with those Americans who are upset with PM Netanyahu's zeal in his wartime conduct in Gaza, my problem is with those Americans who came out against Israel within days of Hamas declaring war on Israel on October 7th.  In World War II, neither Japan nor Germany called for a ceasefire; both were committed to fight to the bitter end.  It took two atomic bombs for Japan to surrender, and the suicide of Hitler for Germany to surrender.  Previous ceasefires in the region have only lasted days and weeks before the Palestinian side ended them.  As long as Palestinians are committed to the destruction of Israel, just so long will their surrender be the only option for peace in the region.  From the looks of things, they are OK with being "martyred" to the last man, woman, and child in their "just war."  In the end, America's soft antisemites are unhappy with Israelis being able to defend themselves.  For those who are in any doubt, antisemitism is alive and kicking in the good ole USA.

Addendum: Friday, 04/11/2025

Here are some indisputable facts.

"The Nakba, which means “catastrophe” in Arabic, refers to the mass displacement and dispossession of Palestinians during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war."  Of course, there were no Palestinians at the time, rather Arab Muslims living in Mandatory Palestine.  Fact #1: The 1948 Arab-Israeli war was initiated by five (+) Arab states, not for the purpose of taking more land, but for the purpose of eliminating the Jewish state of Israel before it had a chance to be born.  Fact #2, the Arab leadership exhorted the Arab population of mandatory Palestine to leave in order to escape the bloodshed of the upcoming war.  Fact #3: the Israeli leadership exhorted its (same) Arab Muslim population to stay and be a part of Israel.  Fact #4, 1/5th of the mandatory Palestinian population stayed in Israel (as Israeli citizens), were therefore not the victims of the Nakba.  Fact #5, the Arab side lost and 800,000 Arab Muslims became refugees (the Palestinian side claims 5 million refugees today).  Fact#6, the displacement of Arab Muslims from Israel was due to a) their leadership warning them to leave and b) losing the war that they started to the new state of Israel.  Fact #7, the "right" to the land that Jews and Arabs and others live on in Israel is the same right that every square inch of land through human history depends on, the right of war, which in this case was initiated by the losing side.  Fact#8: the Palestinian Right of Return is a non-negotiable demand that Palestinian refugees have a legal claim to the homes that they deserted in 1948.  "You (Israelis) won the war but who cares?  We demand OUR land back, or no peace."  Of course, peace means no Jewish state of Israel.

Addendum: Wednesday, 11/05/2025

I have taken the liberty to update the numbers and to add some graphics that will add some visual dynamite to my argument.

End Notes from Stop the Steal

Ben's 2nd book, Stop the Steal, is only available in paperback.  Which makes viewing the sources noted in the End Notes a bit of a problem to find.  So, here, the solution.

1 Mr. Conservative Republican himself, Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona, warned his party against this unholy alliance with these Christians and their leader, https://angelolopez.wordpress.com/2020/05/21/barry-goldwaters-Vight-against-jerry-falwell-and-themoral-majority/