Years ago, when my
daughter was just getting used to college in a western town, one of the first
things that she noticed – that made such an impression on me that I remember it
to this day – was that her classmates there did not mean what they said. She was used to peers who said what they
meant, who said stuff that they would deliver on. Like, “let’s meet at the Shack at 5:30 this
afternoon” or “let’s talk at 8:30 tonight.”
She observed that her college classmates said what they said just to fill the
vacuum of “it’s my turn to say something” without worrying much about what they
said, and without intending to follow through on what they had carelessly
promised.
I understand that it is
easier, more polite, and more socially productive to say “see ya later” than it
is to say “hey, you are not really my best friend and I don’t really care if I never
see you again.” I understand that if we
always told the truth – the raw (and impolitic) truth of the moment – we’d have
nary a single friend left in the world.
At least, that is the way some of us think, and act.
Which leads me to ask the
following question: How hypocritical of us is it to demand of our politicians
what we don’t demand of each other – to tell the unvarnished truth – what we
don’t even demand of ourselves?
And here is a follow-up
question: is the “unvarnished truth” always “politically incorrect”? Can’t the truth be civil? Must it be inflammatory and crude?
No comments:
Post a Comment
I encourage praise, gratitude and especially criticism that is useful. Be polite. Tell your friends.